Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110401
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 13 '19 at 20:48
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Memory 74.3
1-Core 50.1
2-Core 100
48% 74.9 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 192
25% 190 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Asus(1043 8387) 1.2GB
CLim: 762 MHz, MLim: 955 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Lighting 22.9
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 20.8
19% 25.1 fps
MRender 36.5
Gravity 20.1
Splatting 25.1
22% 27.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000NM0011 1TB
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 53 94 93 106 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 112
Write 137
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 85
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 84%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB
7GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 5 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
4.45% Terrible
Read 20.6
Write 6.8
Mixed 3.3
SusWrite 5.3
10% 9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.45%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-020.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 800 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.9% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 7.4
23% 8.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback