MSI Z77MA-S41 (MS-7756)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7756
MotherboardMSI Z77MA-S41 (MS-7756)  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '19 at 12:01
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 487
51% 409 Pts
64-Core 491
30% 491 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Sapphire(174B E194) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
7.27% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 9.12
Parallax 7.22
8% 8.51 fps
MRender 8.95
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 9.26
7% 8.24 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.27%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 256GB-$79
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 260 262 264 264 263 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 475
Write 266
Mixed 299
SusWrite 265
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 33.3
120% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 204
174% 255 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 117%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
160GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 228 115 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 401
Write 400
Mixed 330
SusWrite 180
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 11.9
55% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 38.7
DQ Write 14.8
DQ Mixed 14.9
14% 22.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team-Elite-1600 04CB AM2U16BC4R1-B08S 04EF Team-Elite-1600 04CB AM2U16BC4R1-B08S 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.3% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 16.9
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback