Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3455 3,455 User benchmarks, average bench 29% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Memory 32.6 1-Core 46 2-Core 89.1 31% 55.9 Pts	4-Core 175 8-Core 175 24% 175 Pts	64-Core 158 10% 158 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6026 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.67% Terrible	Lighting 2.43 Reflection 1.92 Parallax 1.72 2% 2.03 fps	MRender 5.19 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 6.48 4% 4.69 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.67% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
QM2T-128 128GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0927A SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 132 135 134 134 134 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.9% Average	Read 338 Write 132 Mixed 136 SusWrite 132 41% 185 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 48.3 4K Mixed 6.3 52% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 48.4 58% 99.7 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 10 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.1 10% 3.43 GB/s	Latency 240 17% 240 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	494x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	485x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	464x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,372x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	493x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	356x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87