Acer ##E5-575G-55Z3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer ##E5-575G-55Z3  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Ironman_SK
Memory7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180906
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateSep 10 '19 at 23:44
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 94.8
2-Core 176
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 264
35% 263 Pts
64-Core 263
16% 263 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 1094) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7000
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.43% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 10
Parallax 6.53
6% 7.79 fps
MRender 7.62
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 14
8% 9.35 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.43%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 512GB
293GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 668 820 756 860 863 551 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,389
Write 866
Mixed 826
SusWrite 753
214% 958 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 91.3
4K Mixed 47.7
165% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 419
DQ Write 532
DQ Mixed 544
391% 498 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 174%
Great: 259%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
635GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 109 112 115 113 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 51
Write 106
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 114
60% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.1
196% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 04EF TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 15.7
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback