Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

8 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Dell Precision WorkStation T3500 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 09KPNV
Memory	16.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110722
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 04 '16 at 14:30
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3530-$287 5,773 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Memory 85.6 1-Core 73.5 2-Core 145 62% 101 Pts	4-Core 249 8-Core 367 38% 308 Pts	64-Core 363 22% 363 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000 15,855 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5382 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.49% Terrible	Lighting 7.57 Reflection 8.92 Parallax 6.34 6% 7.61 fps	MRender 9.71 Gravity 8.13 Splatting 8.43 7% 8.76 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.49% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 128GB 4,859 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM0 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55% Above average	Read 263 Write 169 Mixed 219 48% 217 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 60.8 4K Mixed 18.5 94% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 99.3 DQ Mixed 60.6 67% 116 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88 40,945 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1TB free Firmware: CC4G Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	62.5% Good	Read 110 Write 108 Mixed 96.9 79% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.48 104% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.1% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 15.6 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 11.7 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $374