Lenovo 43515F9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 43515F9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '19 at 18:35
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 167
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 332
42% 322 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600
Nvidia(10DE 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Lighting 4.37
Reflection 4.08
Parallax 4.34
4% 4.26 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 7.04
4% 5.35 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS723232A7A364 320GB
258GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EC2OA60W
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 66 91 54 51 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 93.8
Write 102
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 68.1
59% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR1881ED58E9 2x4GB
2 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 19.8
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback