bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics75.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben, 1100 x 531 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190103
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 10 '19 at 13:27
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6138
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 49.1
1-Core 84.9
2-Core 170
55% 101 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 328
44% 331 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID P40-3Q
Nvidia(10DE 11EA) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 431.2
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.7% Very good
Lighting 128
Reflection 159
Parallax 200
104% 162 fps
MRender 29.5
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 26.9
21% 25.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 215GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 577
Write 323
Mixed 485
102% 462 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 14.6
56% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 14.2
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 188
118% 125 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
Vmware Virtual disk 4GB
4GB free
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 590
Write 353
Mixed 463
104% 468 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 14.7
55% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 189
143% 194 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.9% Above average
MC Read 15
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 22.4
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 6.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback