Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X370-PRO  (all builds)
Memory29.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '19 at 22:34
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 87.6
1-Core 119
2-Core 237
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 765
76% 619 Pts
64-Core 977
60% 977 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.4% Below average
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 40.1
Parallax 36.6
32% 38.5 fps
MRender 50.3
Gravity 36.5
Splatting 38.6
34% 41.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
A400 NVMe SanDisk 256GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A3550012 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 217 212 209 199 204 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 992
Write 671
Mixed 569
SusWrite 220
136% 613 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 51.4
178% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 664
DQ Write 514
DQ Mixed 390
346% 523 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 135%
Great: 145%
Amd-raid Array 1 479GB
295GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 230 213 214 285 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 609
Write 907
Mixed 689
SusWrite 228
137% 608 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 25.7
92% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 612
DQ Mixed 74
143% 270 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 83%
Great: 221%
Amd-raid Array 4 239GB
206GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 227 213 215 283 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 343
Write 142
Mixed 161
SusWrite 227
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 27.3
4K Mixed 11.8
44% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 26.2
DQ Write 31.7
DQ Mixed 21.5
18% 26.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 95%
Amd-raid ST2000DM008-2FR1 2TB
411GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 143 144 139 153 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 100
Write 94.6
Mixed 20
SusWrite 137
64% 88 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
88% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 124%
Amd-raid ST2000DM006-2DM1 2TB
111GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 15 16 16 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C13 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 44.6
MC Write 41.5
MC Mixed 39.4
120% 41.8 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 43
SC Mixed 35.3
102% 35.7 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 116%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $647
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback