ADD TO PC
BUILD

Packard IMEDIA X7500 SP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Packard IMEDIA X7500 SP (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard FMCP7AM
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20081023
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '19 at 19:44
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300-$38 10,428 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Memory 63.2 1-Core 35.6 2-Core 71.3 37% 56.7 Pts	4-Core 126 8-Core 132 17% 129 Pts	64-Core 140 9% 140 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GS 1,408 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B 9600) 512MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	2.05% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 3.73 Parallax 0.84 2% 2.39 fps	MRender 3.14 Gravity 1.77 Splatting 2.26 2% 2.39 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.05% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 281GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 60 62 61 66 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	45.9% Average	Read 96 Write 95.5 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 63.4 59% 79.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 62%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 565GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 41 29 46 40 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Read 75.3 Write 89.3 Mixed 36 SusWrite 40.5 44% 60.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 67% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 62%
Toshiba StorE HDD 320GB 396 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 167GB free, PID 0b15 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 21 28 27 31 31 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 31 Write 30 Mixed 16.8 SusWrite 27 35% 26.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 22% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 4.2 14% 5 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 4.3 14% 4.77 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $47	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback