QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateSep 09 '19 at 16:14
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon L5640
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
37.1% Below average
Memory 35.7
1-Core 55.6
2-Core 111
37% 67.5 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 272
31% 242 Pts
64-Core 267
16% 267 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
EVGA(3842 2716) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.87% Terrible
Lighting 4.57
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 5.06
4% 4.66 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 6.13
4% 4.92 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.87%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 86GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 80 141 118 224 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 528
Write 403
Mixed 520
SusWrite 163
90% 404 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 7.2
21% 6.47 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 60%
Qemu HARDDISK 16GB
15GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 432
Write 538
Mixed 531
112% 501 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 7.6
25% 7.33 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
40.1% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 18.9
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 7.7
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 223
18% 223 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback