Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Toshiba Satellite C650D (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OS	Windows 8
BIOS Date	20111220
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '19 at 07:57
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD C-50 1,781 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1 GHz Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Memory 34.2 1-Core 10.1 2-Core 22.8 16% 22.4 Pts	4-Core 22.3 8-Core 22.8 3% 22.5 Pts	64-Core 16.7 1% 16.7 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 9,902 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 5GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3.3 2.8 3.3 3.2 3.3 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	3.76% Terrible	Read 18 Write 9.3 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 3.1 10% 8.92 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.76% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB 6,386 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.31% Terrible	MC Read 3.1 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 3.9 9% 3.3 GB/s	SC Read 0.2 SC Write 1.2 SC Mixed 2.3 4% 1.23 GB/s	Latency 231 17% 231 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 9.31% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 11,054 samples	16x
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	4x
Radeon HD 6250AMDBench 1%, 1,583 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
LCS-128M6S 2.5 128GBLiteonitBench 78%, 3,907 samples	1x
Solid State Disk 120GBSpccBench 59%, 22,489 samples	1x

RAM
8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 2x2GBMicronBench 34%, 1,373 samples	2x
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	2x
M471B2873FHS-CF8 M471B5673FH0-CF8 3GBSamsungBench 21%, 101 samples	2x

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $48

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16