Acer Aspire E5-572G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-572G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_HWS
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160603
Uptime18.7 Days
Run DateSep 08 '19 at 09:29
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 93
2-Core 160
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 240
31% 234 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0920) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4703
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.52% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 9.85
Parallax 6.12
3% 6.62 fps
MRender 4.05
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.83
4% 4.74 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.52%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 292 238 247 241 249 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 419
Mixed 361
SusWrite 275
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 93.3
4K Mixed 52.8
175% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 358
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 105%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
30.6% Below average
MC Read 10
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 8.4
28% 9.67 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 9.4
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-572G Builds (Compare 216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-572G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback