Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160119
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateSep 08 '19 at 00:00
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6400K APU-$81
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 81.2
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 78.4
51% 74.8 Pts
4-Core 84.6
8-Core 97.1
12% 90.8 Pts
64-Core 91.5
6% 91.5 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
XFX(1682 9270) 2GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.8.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Lighting 32.8
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 39
27% 33.7 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 28.6
Splatting 34.7
25% 30 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 20 11 32 48 49 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.3% Very poor
Read 124
Write 10
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 31.9
12% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 17.3
4K Mixed 10.5
37% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 21.2
DQ Write 26.8
DQ Mixed 17.4
15% 21.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 53%
Generic Mass-Storage 64GB
39GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 16 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 17.9
Write 16.1
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 16.6
23% 16.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.6
175% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.1% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 9.1
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 10.7
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A78M-HD2 Builds (Compare 249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $86
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback