MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B92
MotherboardMSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)  (all builds)
Memory121.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190325
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 07 '19 at 23:28
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 66.5
1-Core 119
2-Core 232
75% 139 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 911
80% 683 Pts
64-Core 2,371
147% 2,371 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 1E84) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.15
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 159
Reflection 150
Parallax 159
129% 156 fps
Gravity 137
Splatting 111
108% 124 fps
Poor: 105% Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 973GB
784GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1534 931 931 819 595 558 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
200% Outstanding
Read 1,786
Write 2564
Mixed 1,216
SusWrite 895
364% 1,615 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 45.8
146% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 779
DQ Write 504
DQ Mixed 604
461% 629 MB/s
Amd-raid Array 2 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 788 787 787 769 765 765 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 627
Write 780
Mixed 888
SusWrite 777
174% 768 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 34.9
113% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 443
DQ Write 502
DQ Mixed 553
394% 499 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 129%
Great: 494%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBD 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
142% Outstanding
MC Read 58.1
MC Write 58.1
MC Mixed 53.4
162% 56.5 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 34.4
SC Mixed 24
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 142%
Great: 141%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,615
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback