Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte H55M-D2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H55M-S2H  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120206
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateSep 07 '19 at 15:47
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3450
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 93.5
1-Core 74.4
2-Core 137
64% 102 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 304
31% 251 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Nvidia(10DE 0973) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.62% Terrible
Lighting 9.4
Reflection 8.58
Parallax 10.2
8% 9.39 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 13
10% 12.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.62%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0801A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 181 107 222 210 215 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.5% Average
Read 230
Write 210
Mixed 201
SusWrite 173
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 12
63% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 25.9
51% 102 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 99%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
236GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 88 86 86 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 91.3
Write 89.5
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 86.1
52% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 75%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD050 500GB
149GB free, PID 0888
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 28 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 26
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 27.3
33% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
38.9% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 11.9
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H55M-S2H Builds (Compare 391 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $73
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback