HP ProBook 4540s

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProBook 4540s  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 17F6
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170714
Uptime8.9 Days
Run DateSep 07 '19 at 11:22
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
49% Average
Memory 77.8
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 132
58% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 138
16% 128 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 17F4) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 4.92
Parallax 2.69
3% 3.8 fps
MRender 3.57
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.35
4% 4.38 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1210A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 201 17 35 26 2.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 323
Write 315
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 54
38% 174 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.2
11% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 101%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
17GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 68 66 63 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 83
Write 50.7
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 69.4
46% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
107% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KN2M64-ETB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
28.9% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 8.9
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 4540s Builds (Compare 1,135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 4540s

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback