Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics59.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180920
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateSep 06 '19 at 16:45
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Memory 95.2
1-Core 128
2-Core 253
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 693
76% 599 Pts
64-Core 724
45% 724 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.2% Above average
Lighting 73.8
Reflection 74.7
Parallax 65.1
60% 71.2 fps
MRender 70.5
Gravity 68.5
Splatting 70.7
57% 69.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 190 169 209 229 288 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 287
Mixed 293
SusWrite 210
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 39.7
158% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 112
115% 182 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 128%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB
964GB free
Firmware: 0109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 72 65 82 89 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 93.8
Write 118
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 80.4
68% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50%
Great: 65%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
833GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 117 102 127 140 176 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 136
Write 136
Mixed 93
SusWrite 128
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 109%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
2GB free
Firmware: 1306
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 54.2
Write 38.5
Mixed 38.5
33% 43.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 59%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
157GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 55 70 76 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 147
Write 136
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 69.9
115% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
42% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x4GB-$47
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 25
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 25.9
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,748 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback