Asrock X370 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsrock X370 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180212
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 05 '19 at 23:11
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$137
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
75.3% Very good
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
82% 174 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 693
69% 548 Pts
64-Core 955
64% 955 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$159
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
59.7% Above average
Lighting 215
Reflection 186
Parallax 296
56% 232 fps
MRender 151
Gravity 221
Splatting 134
60% 168 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$89
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 139 119 118 119 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 316
Mixed 405
SusWrite 178
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 58.2
195% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 361
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 108%
Great: 135%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$87
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 173 174 174 174 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 142
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 174
91% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
364% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 110%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 36 37 36 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 35.3
Write 35.2
Mixed 24
SusWrite 36.5
44% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.4
228% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
45.2% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16.8
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 63%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X370 Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $422
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback