Acer Nitro AN515-53

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-53  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Freed_CFS
Memory20.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '19 at 22:07
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 66.4
2-Core 133
61% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 388
40% 322 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1264) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.99% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 31.4
Parallax 3.06
2% 12.5 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 6.52
4% 4.74 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.99%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 723 347 263 265 263 264 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 854
Write 826
Mixed 771
SusWrite 354
157% 701 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 42.6
146% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 702
DQ Write 609
DQ Mixed 563
447% 625 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 130%
Great: 136%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
2TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 123 128 129 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 13
Write 115
Mixed 51.1
SusWrite 125
56% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.3
244% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 859B CT16G4SFD8266.M16FE 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 22.5
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 24.3
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 77%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-53 Builds (Compare 2,746 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback