Asus GL702VM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus GL702VM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL702VM
Memory22.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime10.1 Days
Run DateSep 05 '19 at 03:48
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 73.5
1-Core 87.7
2-Core 174
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 425
47% 369 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1580) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Lighting 62.5
Reflection 72
Parallax 58.5
51% 64.3 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 59.4
Splatting 65.7
53% 64.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30100P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 224 227 229 230 229 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 430
Write 225
Mixed 176
SusWrite 226
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 22.8
102% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 171
157% 244 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 83%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
694GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 112 111 111 111 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 84.5
Write 88.7
Mixed 31
SusWrite 109
57% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB Kingston 9905630-030.A00G 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
68% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 22.6
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 19.6
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 93.5
43% 93.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL702VM Builds (Compare 445 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: Asus GL702VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback