bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DB75EN
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130704
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 04 '19 at 10:23
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$187
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 94.9
2-Core 182
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 462
48% 386 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Lighting 71.7
Reflection 73.8
Parallax 64.3
58% 69.9 fps
MRender 70.9
Gravity 68.6
Splatting 71.7
58% 70.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 265 302 309 311 304 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 453
Write 328
Mixed 250
SusWrite 277
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 29.3
103% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 113
142% 255 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 110%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
675GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 62 61 62 61 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 56.5
Write 67.5
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 62
42% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB
541GB free, PID ce17
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 24 24 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 21.8
Mixed 22
SusWrite 24.1
32% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-030.A00LF 99U5471-031.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.8% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 14.6
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,340 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback