HP 550-123no

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP 550-123no  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B52
Memory7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170222
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateSep 03 '19 at 10:42
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-8650 Radeon R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
45% Average
Memory 60.6
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 113
47% 78.9 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 165
23% 169 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 365B) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.43% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 1.15
Parallax 3.47
3% 2.94 fps
MRender 5.86
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.04
3% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.43%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
579GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 92 89 90 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 115
Write 154
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 88.8
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 109%
Lacie P9233 8TB
928GB free
Firmware: 1053
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 98 101 106 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
50% Average
Read 72.5
Write 91.5
Mixed 90.3
SusWrite 100
66% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.6
209% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 50%
Great: 92%
WD My Book 25DA 4TB
180GB free, PID 25da
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 75 69 72 76 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 119
Write 82
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 75.3
109% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B1G73EB0-YK0 12GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.1% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 10
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7.1
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550-123no Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: HP 550-123no

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $243
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback