Acer Predator PH315-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics7.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PH315-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Covini_CFS
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '19 at 01:48
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 140
2-Core 276
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 854
83% 682 Pts
64-Core 1,048
65% 1,048 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1343) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6617
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.55% Terrible
Lighting 7.77
Reflection 93.5
Parallax 7.84
6% 36.4 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 7.03
Splatting 15.7
10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.55%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON RBUSNS8 256GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 275 265 264 265 265 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 762
Write 828
Mixed 731
SusWrite 290
147% 653 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 40.5
139% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 699
DQ Write 660
DQ Mixed 582
463% 647 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 121%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 23.1
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 27.6
80% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-52 Builds (Compare 3,937 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback