Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte H110M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '19 at 17:07
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$38
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 124
2-Core 240
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 345
46% 345 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1260 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.8.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
47.7% Average
Lighting 58.9
Reflection 63.2
Parallax 71.4
48% 64.5 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 56.9
Splatting 53.5
47% 58.3 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ST1000DM010-2EP102 120GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 75 52 62 67 69 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 419
Write 48.2
Mixed 9
SusWrite 57.9
28% 134 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 0.9
31% 9.63 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 48.8
DQ Mixed 40.7
41% 68.7 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
506GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 153 152 151 154 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 162
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 153
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV4GX4M1A2133C15 04CB 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
65.8% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 19.8
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 21.8
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback