Asus GL552JX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus GL552JX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL552JX
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime2 Days
Run DateSep 01 '19 at 17:17
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4750HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 172
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 395
41% 331 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Asus(1043 1A8D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3160
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 16
Parallax 17
17% 18.2 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 15.8
14% 16.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 250GB-$55
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 198 195 196 196 154 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 373
Write 291
Mixed 172
SusWrite 191
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 20.6
84% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 55.1
DQ Mixed 78.4
66% 99.1 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 104%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
65GB free
Firmware: SBK2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 64 47 39 4.6 4.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 27
Write 88.2
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 39.4
39% 52.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.6
165% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-063.A00LF Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64.9% Good
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 18.9
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 16.2
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL552JX Builds (Compare 627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL552JX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback