Dell Inspiron 3670

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Inspiron 3670  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0H4VK7
Memory19.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '19 at 17:00
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 125
2-Core 251
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 597
70% 545 Pts
64-Core 655
41% 655 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1216 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.8.1
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 22.7
Reflection 28.8
Parallax 27.5
18% 26.3 fps
MRender 29.5
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 32
23% 28.1 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
798GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 129 164 190 191 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 179
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 165
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 103%
Great: 113%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 107 108 107 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 146
Write 144
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 106
155% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 58%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB
208GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 146
Write 146
Mixed 75.6
SusWrite 0.3
114% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 58%
HGST HUH 721010ALE604 10TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 131
Write 140
Mixed 87.6
SusWrite 0.1
113% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 1.1
268% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 95%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 107 108 107 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 121
Write 125
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 106
138% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 0000000080AD 24GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 25
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 23.7
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Inspiron 3670 Builds (Compare 2,038 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Inspiron 3670

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback