| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 9.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 29.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
| System | HP Z400 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch |
| Memory | 9.7 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20091110 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 31 '16 at 14:45 |
| Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
| Run User | CHE-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63.9%
Good
|
62% 100 Pts
|
30% 232 Pts
|
16% 263 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
Gigabyte(1458 3654) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7570
|
9.33%
Terrible
|
9% 10.7 fps
|
11% 13.1 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Team L3 SSD 240GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
29.3%
Poor
|
35% 159 MB/s
|
22% 6.33 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown ID:01 CE UG25U7200M8DD-AC ID:01 CE UG25U7200M8DD-AC ID:01 CE UG25U7200M8DD-AC ID:01 CE UG25U7200M8DD-AC ID:01 CE UG25U7200M8DD-AC ID:01 CE UG25U7200M8DD-AC 46GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
44.2%
Average
|
44% 15.5 GB/s
|
29% 10 GB/s
|
59% 67.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,344 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z400 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples | 570x |
| Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples | 539x |
| Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples | 491x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 275x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 157x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 138x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 136x |
| 850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 74x |
| A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 66x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $258 |