Lenovo 7824B4U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 7824B4U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '19 at 22:28
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$125
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 93
2-Core 186
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 458
48% 382 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Lighting 40.9
Reflection 32.1
Parallax 38.2
33% 37 fps
MRender 38.9
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 37.5
31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
657GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 227 233 234 232 236 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
68.1% Good
Read 252
Write 213
Mixed 225
SusWrite 224
52% 229 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 34.8
114% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 176
137% 188 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 125%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
166GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 108 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 131
Write 133
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 106
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 77%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101M 1TB
193GB free, PID 0408
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 20.8
Mixed 20
SusWrite 16
28% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 43%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB
295GB free, PID 0408
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 20.8
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 16
28% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 43%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
11GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 4.6 5.2 4.4 4.8 4.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
7.16% Terrible
Read 28.8
Write 3.8
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 4.8
11% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.8
55% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.16%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT25664BA1339.C8F1 Kingston 9905403-447.A00LF CT25664BA1339.C8F1 Kingston 9905403-447.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.7% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15.1
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7824B4U Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 7824B4U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $184
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback