Asus P8Z68-V GEN3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V GEN3  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateAug 31 '19 at 21:21
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 95.6
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 179
73% 122 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 446
48% 379 Pts
64-Core 453
28% 453 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B E207) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28% Poor
Lighting 35.9
Reflection 25.9
Parallax 44.6
29% 35.5 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 35.2
Splatting 32.2
26% 30.8 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ASX900S3-128GM 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.8.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 116 115 111 111 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 400
Write 149
Mixed 183
SusWrite 113
46% 211 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 28.5
103% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 150
114% 154 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST3750330AS 750GB-$137
272GB free
Firmware: SD1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 84 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 64.8
Write 65.3
Mixed 46
SusWrite 87.5
48% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 58%
Seagate ST3750330AS 750GB-$137
213GB free
Firmware: SD1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 64 65 65 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 84.9
Write 13.5
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 64
40% 53.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 58%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
202GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 53 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 59
Write 40.8
Mixed 39.6
SusWrite 53.4
36% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 43%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109
153GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 130 132 129 128 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 119
Write 94.7
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 130
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 029E CMX4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
58.5% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 18.4
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 55.3
72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V GEN3 Builds (Compare 864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V GEN3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $526
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback