ADD TO PC
BUILD

Seneca PRO444438

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Seneca PRO444438 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK B85M-E
Memory	9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 30 '19 at 23:52
Run Duration	115 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4130-$41 49,509 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Memory 92.3 1-Core 100 2-Core 183 74% 125 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 265 36% 267 Pts	64-Core 268 17% 268 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820 7,330 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	21.5% Poor	Lighting 23.7 Reflection 23.8 Parallax 26.8 19% 24.8 fps	MRender 38.7 Gravity 30.1 Splatting 27.1 26% 32 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 22%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP S600 120GB 1,850 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: HC0810H1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 218 227 119 53 20 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 390 Write 469 Mixed 406 SusWrite 157 80% 356 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 79.9 4K Mixed 26.8 127% 46.6 MB/s	DQ Read 88.9 DQ Write 212 DQ Mixed 37.9 61% 113 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1324 F6456U64F1600G 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1324 F6456U64F1600G 12GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 17.6 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 21 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 63.6 63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback