Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '19 at 21:11
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 87.5
1-Core 118
2-Core 235
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 752
75% 610 Pts
64-Core 945
58% 945 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.8.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 115
Parallax 223
110% 158 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 129
Splatting 156
111% 133 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 109%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 298 301 302 299 292 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
71% Very good
Read 454
Write 310
Mixed 283
SusWrite 295
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 23.9
94% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 77.2
DQ Mixed 118
93% 133 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 71%
Great: 73%
Vi550 S3 SSD 512GB
294GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 355 95 97 96 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 385
Write 267
Mixed 328
SusWrite 176
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 32.8
126% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 154
124% 174 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 115%
FM-25S2S-60GBP2 60GB
5GB free
Firmware: 2.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 156
Write 75.2
Mixed 102
24% 111 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 28.6
110% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 63.1
DQ Mixed 79.8
64% 92.3 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
314GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 151 152 150 152 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 150
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 150
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 113%
Intenso Rainbow Line 32GB
25GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 9.5 9.5 11 8.2 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
7% Terrible
Read 22.7
Write 3.5
Mixed 8.4
SusWrite 9.2
12% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 17.5
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $775
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback