HP CQ1130ESm

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP CQ1130ESm  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ACA
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110628
Uptime30.9 Days
Run DateAug 30 '19 at 10:20
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-450 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Memory 55.5
1-Core 8.2
2-Core 18.2
22% 27.3 Pts
4-Core 29.7
8-Core 10.3
3% 20 Pts
64-Core 27.8
2% 27.8 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
HP(103C 2ACA) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.87% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.31
1% 1.29 fps
MRender 1.24
Gravity 0.43
Splatting 1.43
1% 1.04 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.87%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 76 82 30 32 80 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.5% Poor
Read 111
Write 86.2
Mixed 63.1
SusWrite 53
18% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 16.7
4K Mixed 8.9
33% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 65.5
DQ Mixed 24.6
34% 64 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 5.4
12% 4.23 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 0.9
3% 1.07 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback