Samsung 730U3E/740U3E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSamsung 730U3E/740U3E  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP740U3E-S02DE
Memory6.9 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '16 at 16:42
Run Duration88 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3537U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 78
2-Core 151
65% 106 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 202
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0E8) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.66% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 5.62
Parallax 2.97
3% 4.23 fps
MRender 4.33
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 7.87
4% 4.88 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.66%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTD256HAGM-000L1 256GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT41K0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 470
Write 74.9
Mixed 111
47% 219 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 0.78
4K Mixed 0.7
28% 6.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ20UF8BDU0-GN-F Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 10GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
32.6% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 730U3E/740U3E Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 730U3E/740U3E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback