ECS H81H3-M4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardECS H81H3-M4  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '19 at 01:27
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User PAN-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$20
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 86.4
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 171
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 230
32% 239 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.7% Poor
Lighting 32.6
Reflection 26.9
Parallax 36.4
26% 32 fps
MRender 33.2
Gravity 34.5
Splatting 31.6
27% 33.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900J13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 361 363 329 307 295 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 321
Write 175
Mixed 315
SusWrite 306
63% 279 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 91.3
4K Mixed 32.5
132% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 166
144% 209 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 91%
Seagate Momentus Thin 7200 2.5" 320GB-$29
69GB free
Firmware: 0004HPM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 83 84 88 92 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 67
Write 53.8
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 86.5
47% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 0420 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
56.5% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 17.7
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 18.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81H3-M4 Builds (Compare 993 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H81H3-M4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback