| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
| Graphics | 86.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180620 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 29 '19 at 15:16 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | MKD-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
92.7%
Outstanding
|
88% 157 Pts
|
77% 618 Pts
|
46% 742 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
86.6%
Excellent
|
90% 115 fps
|
80% 97.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
245% 1,101 MB/s
|
253% 88.5 MB/s
|
811% 1,132 MB/s
| |
|
|
55.1%
Above average
|
56% 77.2 MB/s
|
158% 1.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2133 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
79.1%
Very good
|
80% 28 GB/s
|
68% 23.9 GB/s
|
62% 64.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF B360-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 2,044 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING - $105
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 541x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 258x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 257x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 217x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 149x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 106x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $581 |