Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '19 at 04:24
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Memory 83.9
1-Core 143
2-Core 287
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 1,116
100% 846 Pts
64-Core 1,461
90% 1,461 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 147
Parallax 138
118% 143 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 136
Splatting 110
97% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 453 457 459 459 429 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 453
Mixed 389
SusWrite 452
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 96.3
4K Mixed 58.7
195% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 117%
Great: 131%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 178 176 174 173 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 155
Mixed 109
SusWrite 176
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 109%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4.5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 168 168 169 170 170 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 169
Mixed 110
SusWrite 168
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
283GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 74 73 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 69.9
Write 76.4
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 73.2
52% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 110%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 9.4 9.3 9.4 8.6 9.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
4.38% Terrible
Read 12.8
Write 6.8
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 9.2
11% 8.62 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.38%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
89.9% Excellent
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 35.6
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 35.3
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,995 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $21

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $854
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback