MSI Z370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B61)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics44.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B61
MotherboardMSI Z370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B61)  (all builds)
Memory20.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190404
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '19 at 20:07
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 92.3
1-Core 128
2-Core 258
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 418
54% 409 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 580
HP(103C 83C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
44.7% Average
Lighting 53
Reflection 66
Parallax 80.8
43% 66.6 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 53.7
Splatting 55.5
48% 58.7 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HP SSD EX920 256 256GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 854 882 496 218 204 215 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 2,214
Write 997
Mixed 869
SusWrite 478
251% 1,140 MB/s
4K Read 65.3
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 85.5
300% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 861
DQ Mixed 167
237% 417 MB/s
Poor: 135%
This bench: 235%
Great: 266%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
567GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 75 74 74 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 84
Write 16.9
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 74.1
39% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$20
83GB free
Firmware: 02.03A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 87 89 89 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 86.3
Write 74.3
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 86.7
56% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
451GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 187 198 212 212 212 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 191
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 201
119% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 110%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
839GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 165 171 177 179 178 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 150
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 172
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD416G26662 8502 PSD48G266681 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84% Excellent
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 26.5
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 23.2
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 84%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B61) Builds (Compare 7,346 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B61) - $125

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $623
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback