HP 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8015
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171023
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 28 '19 at 01:49
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Memory 31
1-Core 26
2-Core 39
21% 32 Pts
4-Core 57.3
8-Core 65.2
8% 61.2 Pts
64-Core 62.6
4% 62.6 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
HP(103C 8015) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.8.2
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
1.76% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.73
Parallax 3.16
2% 2.96 fps
MRender 2.24
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 2.78
2% 2.41 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.76%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
332GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM0P4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 48 47 51 49 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 79
Write 48.1
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 43.7
37% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 60%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
778GB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 78 82 78 75 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 58.9
Write 44.5
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 76.9
70% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 44%
ChipsBnk Multi-Reader 16GB
4GB free, PID 4082
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 4.5 4.6 4.2 4.5 4.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
3.95% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 2.5
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 4.3
9% 8.02 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.95%
Great: 14%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
7GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 9.5 9.3 9.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
6.84% Terrible
Read 22.3
Write 10.2
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 9.7
15% 12.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.7
44% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.84%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.93 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 1.9
6% 1.97 GB/s
Latency 249
16% 249 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 3,230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback