Fujitsu CELSIUS W520

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W520  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3167-A1
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121217
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 26 '19 at 20:13
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2-$248
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 88
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 196
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 360
50% 368 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8650) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.9% Poor
Lighting 35.2
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 35.6
29% 33.3 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 35.8
Splatting 34
29% 35.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 238 240 245 245 245 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.9% Good
Read 254
Write 240
Mixed 232
SusWrite 228
54% 238 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 29.7
96% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 198
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 129%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
466GB free
Firmware: 01.01S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 130 131 131 131 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 138
Write 115
Mixed 107
SusWrite 128
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 76%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
466GB free
Firmware: 01.01S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 131 131 132 132 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 138
Write 126
Mixed 96.8
SusWrite 129
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
60% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 18
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 19.2
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W520 Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W520

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $380
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $139Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback