PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Fujitsu CELSIUS W520 (all builds) |
Motherboard | FUJITSU D3167-A1 |
Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920x1080x4294967296 szín |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121217 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Aug 26 '19 at 20:13 |
Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
Run User | HUN-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2-$248
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
76.2%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8650) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 238 240 245 245 245 MB/s
|
62.9%
Good
|
|||
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
466GB free
Firmware: 01.01S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 130 131 131 131 131 MB/s
|
76.5%
Very good
|
|||
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
466GB free
Firmware: 01.01S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 131 131 132 132 131 MB/s
|
76.5%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
60%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E3-1240 V2Intel $345Bench 71%, 4,997 samples | 16x |
Xeon E3-1225 V2Intel $248Bench 70%, 2,869 samples | 12x |
Xeon E3-1245 V2Intel $368Bench 73%, 2,442 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 11x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 7x |
HD P4000 (Server 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 800 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $380 |