Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R3.0  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '19 at 16:35
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 204
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 442
59% 440 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2050 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.8.1
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55% Above average
Lighting 66.7
Reflection 79.9
Parallax 83
54% 76.5 fps
MRender 76.2
Gravity 66.9
Splatting 64.8
56% 69.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 156 90 60 103 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 450
Write 260
Mixed 339
SusWrite 140
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 36.9
145% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 196
169% 247 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 94%
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45
180GB free
Firmware: 12.01A12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 73 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 69.4
Write 49.8
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 72.5
45% 61 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 35.2
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 40.3
SC Mixed 27.7
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 331 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $191
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback