Gigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 25 '19 at 15:36
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 125
2-Core 251
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 720
77% 611 Pts
64-Core 722
45% 722 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-GEN03SM19EG128GBM2 128GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 59 53 53 54 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 493
Write 412
Mixed 382
SusWrite 111
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 25.5
121% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 1.2
69% 160 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 81%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
174GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 91 96 96 97 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 85
Write 92.3
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 95
61% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
507GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 191 196 196 195 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 150
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 189
102% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.5
163% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
12GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.5 4.7 5 4.3 4.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 18.5
Write 3.7
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 4.5
9% 8.05 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.6
174% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung V-GeN D4S8GL26A8TL 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.1% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 22.6
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 21.5
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 2,323 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $639
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback