Sony VPCZ12Z9E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemSony VPCZ12Z9E  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100730
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '19 at 08:58
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 M 620
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 65.4
1-Core 78.1
2-Core 143
56% 95.5 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 178
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Sony(104D 905A) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2622
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.94% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.19
Parallax 0.94
1% 1.04 fps
MRender 1.57
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.39 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.94%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Volume0 256GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 64 58 108 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 364
Write 252
Mixed 298
SusWrite 79.7
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 11.7
40% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 90.8
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 140
129% 189 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.6% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.5
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback