Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP300E5E-A01US
Memory	3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140828
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 25 '19 at 04:44
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3227U 7,282 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	46.9% Average	Memory 74.6 1-Core 47.3 2-Core 77.3 44% 66.4 Pts	4-Core 112 8-Core 124 16% 118 Pts	64-Core 114 7% 114 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C708) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.58% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 5.31 Parallax 2.78 3% 4.03 fps	MRender 4.52 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 7.61 4% 4.79 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.58% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 453 Write 428 Mixed 366 93% 416 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 55.7 4K Mixed 30.8 106% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 96.4 DQ Mixed 119 92% 126 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB 8,778 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 3GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 22 Write 1 Mixed 6.8 SusWrite 16.8 14% 11.6 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.4 137% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 Elpida EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F 6GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.4% Below average	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 9.5 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 9.1 26% 8.97 GB/s	Latency 91.3 44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 38%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

CPU
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	85x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	77x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	37x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	189x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	40x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	35x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
MX500 250GBCrucial $39Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	6x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	25x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	22x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16