Hp-pavilion GN689AAR-ABA m8277c

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemHp-pavilion GN689AAR-ABA m8277c  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Berkeley
Memory4.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20071024
Uptime7 Days
Run DateAug 24 '19 at 19:44
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
43.8% Average
Memory 72.7
1-Core 45.5
2-Core 90.8
45% 69.7 Pts
4-Core 90.1
8-Core 90.4
12% 90.2 Pts
64-Core 90.4
6% 90.4 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 4870
Sapphire(174B E810) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
7.69% Terrible
Lighting 9.77
Reflection 9
Parallax 6.66
8% 8.47 fps
MRender 7.33
Gravity 5.97
Splatting 11.7
7% 8.33 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.69%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 106 106 114 113 112 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50% Average
Read 196
Write 150
Mixed 162
SusWrite 108
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 30.5
106% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 31.9
DQ Write 79.9
DQ Mixed 36.8
34% 49.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 50%
Great: 82%
Seagate ST3000NM0033-9ZM178 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: SN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 106 107 114 113 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 177
Write 171
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 109
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.2
247% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 102%
WD Red Pro 3TB (2014)-$76
3TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 164 163 173 173 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 165
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 167
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 100%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
21.3% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 6.1
19% 6.77 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.2
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 95.3
42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GN689AAR-ABA m8277c Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion GN689AAR-ABA m8277c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 13% - Very poor Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback