Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics39.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP300E4C-AD5BR
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '19 at 19:24
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 181
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 449
50% 396 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.8.1
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.6% Below average
Lighting 46.3
Reflection 62.7
Parallax 63.9
38% 57.7 fps
MRender 58.6
Gravity 48.8
Splatting 52.1
43% 53.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 49%
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C652) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.85% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 5.54
Parallax 2.91
3% 4.21 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 8.04
5% 5.44 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.85%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0123A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 46 52 42 49 45 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.4% Below average
Read 254
Write 226
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 67.7
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 30.7
4K Mixed 2.7
54% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 3.5
48% 111 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 93%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
65GB free
Firmware: JE3OA50A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 63 67 67 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 63.6
Write 59.4
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 65.7
41% 56 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
58% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 18.7
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C Builds (Compare 1,055 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback