Asus PRIME H310M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H310M-E (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180418
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 24 '19 at 13:28
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Memory 83.5 1-Core 129 2-Core 241 84% 151 Pts	4-Core 480 8-Core 746 76% 613 Pts	64-Core 744 46% 744 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB; CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51% Above average	Lighting 60.4 Reflection 58.5 Parallax 46.1 49% 55 fps	MRender 71 Gravity 63.3 Splatting 65.9 54% 66.7 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 492 329 326 325 324 325 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	154% Outstanding	Read 619 Write 548 Mixed 547 SusWrite 354 116% 517 MB/s	4K Read 53.2 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 70.4 234% 81.2 MB/s	DQ Read 844 DQ Write 729 DQ Mixed 988 685% 853 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 154% Great: 280%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 571GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 142 142 139 140 140 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Read 161 Write 139 Mixed 93.3 SusWrite 141 98% 133 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GEIL CL17-17-17 D4-2400 2x8GB 1,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	MC Read 29.1 MC Write 29.1 MC Mixed 22.1 76% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 28.2 SC Mixed 23.4 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 74.4 54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H310M-E Builds (Compare 735 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-E

CPU
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	221x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	200x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	93x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	98x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	67x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)IntelBench 5%, 32,403 samples	60x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	66x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	28x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	20x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	22x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GBCorsair $25Bench 42%, 47,473 samples	21x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $197

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16