Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-DS2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A78M-DS2  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '19 at 12:32
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 83.2
1-Core 69.4
2-Core 130
58% 94 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 208
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
Asus(1043 042A) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28% Poor
Lighting 35.4
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 45.6
29% 37.4 fps
MRender 27.9
Gravity 29.6
Splatting 36.6
26% 31.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 77 123 75 132 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 417
Write 321
Mixed 267
SusWrite 126
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 17.3
66% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 82.5
DQ Mixed 41.8
47% 79.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 56%
StoreJet Transcend 250GB
38GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 55 55 54 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 55.6
Write 49.4
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 54.1
66% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 170%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905402-670.A 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
22.1% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A78M-DS2 Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-DS2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback