Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING K1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive323% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270H GAMING K1  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171225
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 24 '19 at 04:33
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 97.4
1-Core 140
2-Core 262
94% 167 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 715
72% 587 Pts
64-Core 736
46% 736 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2890 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 76.4
Parallax 187
144% 147 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 177
Splatting 126
116% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 872F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.41% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 9.12
4% 8.54 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 8.33
Splatting 16.5
9% 9.62 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.41%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
873GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1769 1803 1448 1167 1170 1182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
323% Outstanding
Read 2,428
Write 2,309
Mixed 1,641
SusWrite 1423
437% 1,950 MB/s
4K Read 61.2
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 84.8
284% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,242
DQ Write 1,058
DQ Mixed 1,148
861% 1,149 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 323%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
927GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 466 467 466 465 466 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 469
Mixed 420
SusWrite 466
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 63.2
214% 75.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 361
271% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Samsung MZ7LN512HCHP-00000 512GB
472GB free
Firmware: EMT0100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 461 462 461 460 461 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 450
Mixed 322
SusWrite 461
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 47.7
178% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 286
236% 338 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 119%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 30.3
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 36.2
SC Mixed 30.6
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 48.5
82% 48.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270H GAMING K1 Builds (Compare 314 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING K1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $870
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback