Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics62.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 9  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 22 '19 at 18:57
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 98.4
1-Core 162
2-Core 324
106% 195 Pts
4-Core 623
8-Core 1,025
101% 824 Pts
64-Core 1,355
84% 1,355 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 107%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.8% Good
Lighting 78.9
Reflection 79
Parallax 73.4
64% 77.1 fps
MRender 73.8
Gravity 70.3
Splatting 74.1
60% 72.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1374 397 401 403 403 402 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 2,081
Write 1,519
Mixed 1,263
SusWrite 563
302% 1,357 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 63.8
241% 89.8 MB/s
DQ Read 994
DQ Write 1,436
DQ Mixed 1,158
892% 1,196 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 245%
Great: 302%
Jmicron Generic 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 1507
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 392 394 388 388 388 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 376
Write 376
Mixed 366
SusWrite 392
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 31.1
97% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 177
134% 181 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 91%
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$65
2TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 185 187 187 186 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 180
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 186
114% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 107%
Great: 100%
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$65
2TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 177 178 178 179 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 153
Mixed 72
SusWrite 178
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 100%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 183 184 184 185 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 151
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 183
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 26.8
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 32
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 44.2
90% 44.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming 9 Builds (Compare 326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $998
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback