Acer Aspire V3-571G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-571G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA50_HC_CR
Memory4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120806
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 22 '19 at 00:31
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 82.8
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 141
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 198
23% 178 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640M
Acer(1025 0648) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7254
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.53% Terrible
Lighting 6.13
Reflection 5.81
Parallax 6.72
5% 6.22 fps
MRender 7.67
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 8.43
7% 7.97 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.53%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,703
Write 49.7
Mixed 99
267% 1,284 MB/s
4K Read 629
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 6.3
963% 213 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 69%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
264GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 68.8
Mixed 43.7
43% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B88G0NS-CG Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 6GB
1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
36% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 11.2
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 11.7
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-571G Builds (Compare 1,001 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-571G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback